Review



antibodies against il 8  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems antibodies against il 8
    MIIP in CRC cells inhibits neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through <t>IL‐8.</t> (A) Human cytokine array of the CM collected from SW620 cells with vector control and MIIP overexpression. (B) ELISA quantification of secreted IL‐8 protein levels in CM derived from three CRC cell lines with differential MIIP expression ( n = 3). (C) Volcano plot of DEGs from RNA‐seq analysis of CRC cell lines with varying levels of MIIP expression ( n = 3 per group). (D) CXCL8 mRNA expression in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression was tested by RT–qPCR ( n = 3). (E) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to CRC CM with or without recombinant human IL‐8 protein (rhIL‐8). Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CRC CM with or without anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody (N‐IL‐8) ( n = 3). (F–H) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining ( n = 5) and MPO‐DNA ELISA ( n = 3) for NETs formation after neutrophils were co‐cultured with the CM from SW620 cells treated with recombinant IL‐8 protein and with the CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated with an anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody. Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and two‐way ANOVA in (B, D, E, G, and H).
    Antibodies Against Il 8, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 241 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+il+8+cxcl8+antibody/Human+IL-8%2FCXCL8+Antibody/pmc13624310-144-5-11
    Average 95 stars, based on 241 article reviews
    antibodies against il 8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "MIIP Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Progression by Modulating Neutrophils Infiltration and Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation"

    Article Title: MIIP Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Progression by Modulating Neutrophils Infiltration and Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation

    Journal: Advanced Science

    doi: 10.1002/advs.78063

    MIIP in CRC cells inhibits neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through IL‐8. (A) Human cytokine array of the CM collected from SW620 cells with vector control and MIIP overexpression. (B) ELISA quantification of secreted IL‐8 protein levels in CM derived from three CRC cell lines with differential MIIP expression ( n = 3). (C) Volcano plot of DEGs from RNA‐seq analysis of CRC cell lines with varying levels of MIIP expression ( n = 3 per group). (D) CXCL8 mRNA expression in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression was tested by RT–qPCR ( n = 3). (E) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to CRC CM with or without recombinant human IL‐8 protein (rhIL‐8). Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CRC CM with or without anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody (N‐IL‐8) ( n = 3). (F–H) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining ( n = 5) and MPO‐DNA ELISA ( n = 3) for NETs formation after neutrophils were co‐cultured with the CM from SW620 cells treated with recombinant IL‐8 protein and with the CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated with an anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody. Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and two‐way ANOVA in (B, D, E, G, and H).
    Figure Legend Snippet: MIIP in CRC cells inhibits neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through IL‐8. (A) Human cytokine array of the CM collected from SW620 cells with vector control and MIIP overexpression. (B) ELISA quantification of secreted IL‐8 protein levels in CM derived from three CRC cell lines with differential MIIP expression ( n = 3). (C) Volcano plot of DEGs from RNA‐seq analysis of CRC cell lines with varying levels of MIIP expression ( n = 3 per group). (D) CXCL8 mRNA expression in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression was tested by RT–qPCR ( n = 3). (E) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to CRC CM with or without recombinant human IL‐8 protein (rhIL‐8). Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CRC CM with or without anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody (N‐IL‐8) ( n = 3). (F–H) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining ( n = 5) and MPO‐DNA ELISA ( n = 3) for NETs formation after neutrophils were co‐cultured with the CM from SW620 cells treated with recombinant IL‐8 protein and with the CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated with an anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody. Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and two‐way ANOVA in (B, D, E, G, and H).

    Techniques Used: Plasmid Preparation, Control, Over Expression, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Derivative Assay, Expressing, RNA Sequencing, Analysis, Quantitative RT-PCR, Recombinant, Staining, Cell Culture

    MIIP in CRC cells decreases neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through NF‐κB p65/IL‐8 signaling. (A) Bubble plot of the enriched KEGG pathways showing that the NF‐κB signaling pathway was enriched in HCT116 cells (marked with a red border). (B) GSEA revealed that MIIP knockdown in HCT116 cells significantly activated the NF‐κB signaling pathway. (C) Western blotting analysis of key proteins involved in the NF‐κB p65 signaling pathway in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression. (D) Representative images of H&E and IHC staining for MIIP, p‐p65, IL‐8, and Ly6G in tumors from the cecum of an orthotopic CRC mouse model between the MIIP‐overexpressing group and the control group (n = 5 per group). Scale bar, 50 µm. (E) Statistical analysis of Ly6G + neutrophils and the expression of p‐p65 and IL‐8 in different groups. (F) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining for MPO (red), Cit‐H3 (green), and DAPI (blue) in tumor tissue from the cecum and comparisons between the two groups ( n = 5). Scale bar, 25 µm. (G) Western blotting of NF‐κB p65 and NF‐κB p‐p65 in CRC cells treated with or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor (Bay 11–7082, 10 µM). (H) RT‐qPCR of CXCL8 mRNA in CRC cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3). (I) ELISA of IL‐8 in CM from CRC cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3). (J) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CM from CRC cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3). (K–M) ELISA of MPO‐DNA and representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining for NETs formation after neutrophils were cultured with CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3–5). Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and the Mann‐Whitney U test in (E); the Mann‐Whitney U test in (F); and two‐way ANOVA in (H, I, J, K, and M).
    Figure Legend Snippet: MIIP in CRC cells decreases neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through NF‐κB p65/IL‐8 signaling. (A) Bubble plot of the enriched KEGG pathways showing that the NF‐κB signaling pathway was enriched in HCT116 cells (marked with a red border). (B) GSEA revealed that MIIP knockdown in HCT116 cells significantly activated the NF‐κB signaling pathway. (C) Western blotting analysis of key proteins involved in the NF‐κB p65 signaling pathway in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression. (D) Representative images of H&E and IHC staining for MIIP, p‐p65, IL‐8, and Ly6G in tumors from the cecum of an orthotopic CRC mouse model between the MIIP‐overexpressing group and the control group (n = 5 per group). Scale bar, 50 µm. (E) Statistical analysis of Ly6G + neutrophils and the expression of p‐p65 and IL‐8 in different groups. (F) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining for MPO (red), Cit‐H3 (green), and DAPI (blue) in tumor tissue from the cecum and comparisons between the two groups ( n = 5). Scale bar, 25 µm. (G) Western blotting of NF‐κB p65 and NF‐κB p‐p65 in CRC cells treated with or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor (Bay 11–7082, 10 µM). (H) RT‐qPCR of CXCL8 mRNA in CRC cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3). (I) ELISA of IL‐8 in CM from CRC cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3). (J) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CM from CRC cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3). (K–M) ELISA of MPO‐DNA and representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining for NETs formation after neutrophils were cultured with CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3–5). Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and the Mann‐Whitney U test in (E); the Mann‐Whitney U test in (F); and two‐way ANOVA in (H, I, J, K, and M).

    Techniques Used: Knockdown, Western Blot, Analysis, Expressing, Immunohistochemistry, Control, Staining, Tissue, Quantitative RT-PCR, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Cell Culture, MANN-WHITNEY

    MIIP modulates the NF‐κB p65/IL‐8 signaling pathway ‐mediated neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through interactions with PKR. (A) IP–MS revealed PKR as a MIIP‐interacting protein. (B) The binding structure of MIIP and PKR was predicted using HDOCK molecular docking software. (C) Endogenous interaction between MIIP and PKR were detected via Co‐IP in HCT116 cells. (D) 293T cells were cotransfected with MIIP‐Flag and PKR‐HA, and reverse and forward Co‐IP analyses were performed. (E) Co‐IP assays were used to determine the PKR‐binding region of MIIP. (F) Co‐IP assays revealed that the PKR binding site for MIIP encompasses its IKKβ‐binding domain. (G) The expression of PKR was determined by Western blotting in CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression. (H) Co‐IP was performed to examine the effect of MIIP expression on the interaction between PKR and IKKβ. (I–M) Double‐stable transgenic CRC cell lines were used in a rescue assay to demonstrate that the regulatory effects of MIIP on the NF‐κB p65‐mediated IL‐8 signaling pathway (I–K) and NETs formation (L, M) were dependent on PKR ( n = 3–5). All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using two‐way ANOVA in (J–M).
    Figure Legend Snippet: MIIP modulates the NF‐κB p65/IL‐8 signaling pathway ‐mediated neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through interactions with PKR. (A) IP–MS revealed PKR as a MIIP‐interacting protein. (B) The binding structure of MIIP and PKR was predicted using HDOCK molecular docking software. (C) Endogenous interaction between MIIP and PKR were detected via Co‐IP in HCT116 cells. (D) 293T cells were cotransfected with MIIP‐Flag and PKR‐HA, and reverse and forward Co‐IP analyses were performed. (E) Co‐IP assays were used to determine the PKR‐binding region of MIIP. (F) Co‐IP assays revealed that the PKR binding site for MIIP encompasses its IKKβ‐binding domain. (G) The expression of PKR was determined by Western blotting in CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression. (H) Co‐IP was performed to examine the effect of MIIP expression on the interaction between PKR and IKKβ. (I–M) Double‐stable transgenic CRC cell lines were used in a rescue assay to demonstrate that the regulatory effects of MIIP on the NF‐κB p65‐mediated IL‐8 signaling pathway (I–K) and NETs formation (L, M) were dependent on PKR ( n = 3–5). All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using two‐way ANOVA in (J–M).

    Techniques Used: Protein-Protein interactions, Binding Assay, Docking Assay, Software, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Expressing, Western Blot, Transgenic Assay, Rescue Assay

    Schematic illustration shows that MIIP inhibits colorectal cancer progression by decreasing TANs infiltration and NETs formation through the PKR/NF‐κB p65/IL‐8 axis, providing potential therapeutic strategies for colorectal cancer.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Schematic illustration shows that MIIP inhibits colorectal cancer progression by decreasing TANs infiltration and NETs formation through the PKR/NF‐κB p65/IL‐8 axis, providing potential therapeutic strategies for colorectal cancer.

    Techniques Used:

    Related Articles

    Control:

    Article Title: H-2g, a glucose analog of blood group H antigen, mediates monocyte recruitment in vitro and in vivo via IL-8/CXCL8
    Article Snippet: After 4 weeks of engraftment, human PB MNs were dyetagged with PKH26 fluorescent dye (Sigma-Aldrich), and were injected intravenously. .. Simultaneously, H-2g (10 μM) with an anti-IL-8/CXCL8 antibody or an isotype control antibody (R&D Systems, Inc) was injected into the RA ST grafts. ..

    Article Title: H-2g, a glucose analog of blood group H antigen, mediates monocyte recruitment in vitro and in vivo via IL-8/CXCL8
    Article Snippet: After 4 weeks of engraftment, human PB MNs were dye-tagged with PKH26 fluorescent dye (Sigma-Aldrich), and were injected intravenously. .. Simultaneously, H-2g (10 μM) with an anti-IL-8/CXCL8 antibody or an isotype control antibody (R&D Systems, Inc) was injected into the RA ST grafts. ..

    Injection:

    Article Title: H-2g, a glucose analog of blood group H antigen, mediates monocyte recruitment in vitro and in vivo via IL-8/CXCL8
    Article Snippet: After 4 weeks of engraftment, human PB MNs were dyetagged with PKH26 fluorescent dye (Sigma-Aldrich), and were injected intravenously. .. Simultaneously, H-2g (10 μM) with an anti-IL-8/CXCL8 antibody or an isotype control antibody (R&D Systems, Inc) was injected into the RA ST grafts. ..

    Article Title: H-2g, a glucose analog of blood group H antigen, mediates monocyte recruitment in vitro and in vivo via IL-8/CXCL8
    Article Snippet: After 4 weeks of engraftment, human PB MNs were dye-tagged with PKH26 fluorescent dye (Sigma-Aldrich), and were injected intravenously. .. Simultaneously, H-2g (10 μM) with an anti-IL-8/CXCL8 antibody or an isotype control antibody (R&D Systems, Inc) was injected into the RA ST grafts. ..



    Similar Products

    93
    MedChemExpress il 8 protein
    MIIP in CRC cells inhibits neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through <t>IL‐8.</t> (A) Human cytokine array of the CM collected from SW620 cells with vector control and MIIP overexpression. (B) ELISA quantification of secreted IL‐8 protein levels in CM derived from three CRC cell lines with differential MIIP expression ( n = 3). (C) Volcano plot of DEGs from RNA‐seq analysis of CRC cell lines with varying levels of MIIP expression ( n = 3 per group). (D) CXCL8 mRNA expression in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression was tested by RT–qPCR ( n = 3). (E) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to CRC CM with or without recombinant human IL‐8 protein (rhIL‐8). Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CRC CM with or without anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody (N‐IL‐8) ( n = 3). (F–H) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining ( n = 5) and MPO‐DNA ELISA ( n = 3) for NETs formation after neutrophils were co‐cultured with the CM from SW620 cells treated with recombinant IL‐8 protein and with the CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated with an anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody. Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and two‐way ANOVA in (B, D, E, G, and H).
    Il 8 Protein, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+il+8+cxcl8+antibody/IL-8%2FCXCL8%2C+Human/pmc13624310-144-16-21
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    il 8 protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    R&D Systems antibodies against il 8
    MIIP in CRC cells inhibits neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through <t>IL‐8.</t> (A) Human cytokine array of the CM collected from SW620 cells with vector control and MIIP overexpression. (B) ELISA quantification of secreted IL‐8 protein levels in CM derived from three CRC cell lines with differential MIIP expression ( n = 3). (C) Volcano plot of DEGs from RNA‐seq analysis of CRC cell lines with varying levels of MIIP expression ( n = 3 per group). (D) CXCL8 mRNA expression in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression was tested by RT–qPCR ( n = 3). (E) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to CRC CM with or without recombinant human IL‐8 protein (rhIL‐8). Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CRC CM with or without anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody (N‐IL‐8) ( n = 3). (F–H) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining ( n = 5) and MPO‐DNA ELISA ( n = 3) for NETs formation after neutrophils were co‐cultured with the CM from SW620 cells treated with recombinant IL‐8 protein and with the CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated with an anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody. Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and two‐way ANOVA in (B, D, E, G, and H).
    Antibodies Against Il 8, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+il+8+cxcl8+antibody/Human+IL-8%2FCXCL8+Antibody/pmc13624310-144-5-11
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antibodies against il 8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    RayBiotech inc raybio c series
    MIIP in CRC cells inhibits neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through <t>IL‐8.</t> (A) Human cytokine array of the CM collected from SW620 cells with vector control and MIIP overexpression. (B) ELISA quantification of secreted IL‐8 protein levels in CM derived from three CRC cell lines with differential MIIP expression ( n = 3). (C) Volcano plot of DEGs from RNA‐seq analysis of CRC cell lines with varying levels of MIIP expression ( n = 3 per group). (D) CXCL8 mRNA expression in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression was tested by RT–qPCR ( n = 3). (E) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to CRC CM with or without recombinant human IL‐8 protein (rhIL‐8). Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CRC CM with or without anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody (N‐IL‐8) ( n = 3). (F–H) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining ( n = 5) and MPO‐DNA ELISA ( n = 3) for NETs formation after neutrophils were co‐cultured with the CM from SW620 cells treated with recombinant IL‐8 protein and with the CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated with an anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody. Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and two‐way ANOVA in (B, D, E, G, and H).
    Raybio C Series, supplied by RayBiotech inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+il+8+cxcl8+antibody/Recombinant+Human+IL-8+%2F+CXCL8/pmc13256109-757-6-6
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    raybio c series - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Bioss rabbit il
    MIIP in CRC cells inhibits neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through <t>IL‐8.</t> (A) Human cytokine array of the CM collected from SW620 cells with vector control and MIIP overexpression. (B) ELISA quantification of secreted IL‐8 protein levels in CM derived from three CRC cell lines with differential MIIP expression ( n = 3). (C) Volcano plot of DEGs from RNA‐seq analysis of CRC cell lines with varying levels of MIIP expression ( n = 3 per group). (D) CXCL8 mRNA expression in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression was tested by RT–qPCR ( n = 3). (E) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to CRC CM with or without recombinant human IL‐8 protein (rhIL‐8). Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CRC CM with or without anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody (N‐IL‐8) ( n = 3). (F–H) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining ( n = 5) and MPO‐DNA ELISA ( n = 3) for NETs formation after neutrophils were co‐cultured with the CM from SW620 cells treated with recombinant IL‐8 protein and with the CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated with an anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody. Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and two‐way ANOVA in (B, D, E, G, and H).
    Rabbit Il, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+il+8+cxcl8+antibody/IL-8+Polyclonal+Antibody/pm41998542-91-19-23
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit il - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti cxcl8 cat
    MIIP in CRC cells inhibits neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through <t>IL‐8.</t> (A) Human cytokine array of the CM collected from SW620 cells with vector control and MIIP overexpression. (B) ELISA quantification of secreted IL‐8 protein levels in CM derived from three CRC cell lines with differential MIIP expression ( n = 3). (C) Volcano plot of DEGs from RNA‐seq analysis of CRC cell lines with varying levels of MIIP expression ( n = 3 per group). (D) CXCL8 mRNA expression in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression was tested by RT–qPCR ( n = 3). (E) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to CRC CM with or without recombinant human IL‐8 protein (rhIL‐8). Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CRC CM with or without anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody (N‐IL‐8) ( n = 3). (F–H) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining ( n = 5) and MPO‐DNA ELISA ( n = 3) for NETs formation after neutrophils were co‐cultured with the CM from SW620 cells treated with recombinant IL‐8 protein and with the CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated with an anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody. Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and two‐way ANOVA in (B, D, E, G, and H).
    Anti Cxcl8 Cat, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+il+8+cxcl8+antibody/IL-8+XP+Rabbit+mAb/pmc13003979-102-60-64
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cxcl8 cat - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    R&D Systems anti cxcl8 antibody
    MIIP in CRC cells inhibits neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through <t>IL‐8.</t> (A) Human cytokine array of the CM collected from SW620 cells with vector control and MIIP overexpression. (B) ELISA quantification of secreted IL‐8 protein levels in CM derived from three CRC cell lines with differential MIIP expression ( n = 3). (C) Volcano plot of DEGs from RNA‐seq analysis of CRC cell lines with varying levels of MIIP expression ( n = 3 per group). (D) CXCL8 mRNA expression in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression was tested by RT–qPCR ( n = 3). (E) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to CRC CM with or without recombinant human IL‐8 protein (rhIL‐8). Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CRC CM with or without anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody (N‐IL‐8) ( n = 3). (F–H) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining ( n = 5) and MPO‐DNA ELISA ( n = 3) for NETs formation after neutrophils were co‐cultured with the CM from SW620 cells treated with recombinant IL‐8 protein and with the CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated with an anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody. Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and two‐way ANOVA in (B, D, E, G, and H).
    Anti Cxcl8 Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+il+8+cxcl8+antibody/Human+IL-8%2FCXCL8+Antibody/pm41780840-107-6-10
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cxcl8 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Proteintech anti cxcl8
    MIIP in CRC cells inhibits neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through <t>IL‐8.</t> (A) Human cytokine array of the CM collected from SW620 cells with vector control and MIIP overexpression. (B) ELISA quantification of secreted IL‐8 protein levels in CM derived from three CRC cell lines with differential MIIP expression ( n = 3). (C) Volcano plot of DEGs from RNA‐seq analysis of CRC cell lines with varying levels of MIIP expression ( n = 3 per group). (D) CXCL8 mRNA expression in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression was tested by RT–qPCR ( n = 3). (E) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to CRC CM with or without recombinant human IL‐8 protein (rhIL‐8). Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CRC CM with or without anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody (N‐IL‐8) ( n = 3). (F–H) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining ( n = 5) and MPO‐DNA ELISA ( n = 3) for NETs formation after neutrophils were co‐cultured with the CM from SW620 cells treated with recombinant IL‐8 protein and with the CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated with an anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody. Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and two‐way ANOVA in (B, D, E, G, and H).
    Anti Cxcl8, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+il+8+cxcl8+antibody/CXCL8%2FIL-8+Antibody/pm41780840-61-65-66
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cxcl8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Proteintech anti il 8
    MIIP in CRC cells inhibits neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through <t>IL‐8.</t> (A) Human cytokine array of the CM collected from SW620 cells with vector control and MIIP overexpression. (B) ELISA quantification of secreted IL‐8 protein levels in CM derived from three CRC cell lines with differential MIIP expression ( n = 3). (C) Volcano plot of DEGs from RNA‐seq analysis of CRC cell lines with varying levels of MIIP expression ( n = 3 per group). (D) CXCL8 mRNA expression in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression was tested by RT–qPCR ( n = 3). (E) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to CRC CM with or without recombinant human IL‐8 protein (rhIL‐8). Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CRC CM with or without anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody (N‐IL‐8) ( n = 3). (F–H) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining ( n = 5) and MPO‐DNA ELISA ( n = 3) for NETs formation after neutrophils were co‐cultured with the CM from SW620 cells treated with recombinant IL‐8 protein and with the CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated with an anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody. Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and two‐way ANOVA in (B, D, E, G, and H).
    Anti Il 8, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+il+8+cxcl8+antibody/CXCL8%2FIL-8+Antibody/pm41662806-51-106-108
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti il 8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    R&D Systems interleukin 8
    MIIP in CRC cells inhibits neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through <t>IL‐8.</t> (A) Human cytokine array of the CM collected from SW620 cells with vector control and MIIP overexpression. (B) ELISA quantification of secreted IL‐8 protein levels in CM derived from three CRC cell lines with differential MIIP expression ( n = 3). (C) Volcano plot of DEGs from RNA‐seq analysis of CRC cell lines with varying levels of MIIP expression ( n = 3 per group). (D) CXCL8 mRNA expression in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression was tested by RT–qPCR ( n = 3). (E) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to CRC CM with or without recombinant human IL‐8 protein (rhIL‐8). Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CRC CM with or without anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody (N‐IL‐8) ( n = 3). (F–H) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining ( n = 5) and MPO‐DNA ELISA ( n = 3) for NETs formation after neutrophils were co‐cultured with the CM from SW620 cells treated with recombinant IL‐8 protein and with the CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated with an anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody. Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and two‐way ANOVA in (B, D, E, G, and H).
    Interleukin 8, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+il+8+cxcl8+antibody/Human+IL-8%2FCXCL8+Antibody/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__01__15__695726-50-8-12
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    interleukin 8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Boster Bio human il 8 elisa kit
    MIIP in CRC cells inhibits neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through <t>IL‐8.</t> (A) Human cytokine array of the CM collected from SW620 cells with vector control and MIIP overexpression. (B) ELISA quantification of secreted IL‐8 protein levels in CM derived from three CRC cell lines with differential MIIP expression ( n = 3). (C) Volcano plot of DEGs from RNA‐seq analysis of CRC cell lines with varying levels of MIIP expression ( n = 3 per group). (D) CXCL8 mRNA expression in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression was tested by RT–qPCR ( n = 3). (E) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to CRC CM with or without recombinant human IL‐8 protein (rhIL‐8). Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CRC CM with or without anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody (N‐IL‐8) ( n = 3). (F–H) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining ( n = 5) and MPO‐DNA ELISA ( n = 3) for NETs formation after neutrophils were co‐cultured with the CM from SW620 cells treated with recombinant IL‐8 protein and with the CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated with an anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody. Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and two‐way ANOVA in (B, D, E, G, and H).
    Human Il 8 Elisa Kit, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+il+8+cxcl8+antibody/Anti-IL-8+CXCL8+Antibody/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__01__07__697636-250-27-31
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human il 8 elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    MIIP in CRC cells inhibits neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through IL‐8. (A) Human cytokine array of the CM collected from SW620 cells with vector control and MIIP overexpression. (B) ELISA quantification of secreted IL‐8 protein levels in CM derived from three CRC cell lines with differential MIIP expression ( n = 3). (C) Volcano plot of DEGs from RNA‐seq analysis of CRC cell lines with varying levels of MIIP expression ( n = 3 per group). (D) CXCL8 mRNA expression in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression was tested by RT–qPCR ( n = 3). (E) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to CRC CM with or without recombinant human IL‐8 protein (rhIL‐8). Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CRC CM with or without anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody (N‐IL‐8) ( n = 3). (F–H) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining ( n = 5) and MPO‐DNA ELISA ( n = 3) for NETs formation after neutrophils were co‐cultured with the CM from SW620 cells treated with recombinant IL‐8 protein and with the CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated with an anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody. Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and two‐way ANOVA in (B, D, E, G, and H).

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: MIIP Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Progression by Modulating Neutrophils Infiltration and Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation

    doi: 10.1002/advs.78063

    Figure Lengend Snippet: MIIP in CRC cells inhibits neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through IL‐8. (A) Human cytokine array of the CM collected from SW620 cells with vector control and MIIP overexpression. (B) ELISA quantification of secreted IL‐8 protein levels in CM derived from three CRC cell lines with differential MIIP expression ( n = 3). (C) Volcano plot of DEGs from RNA‐seq analysis of CRC cell lines with varying levels of MIIP expression ( n = 3 per group). (D) CXCL8 mRNA expression in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression was tested by RT–qPCR ( n = 3). (E) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to CRC CM with or without recombinant human IL‐8 protein (rhIL‐8). Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CRC CM with or without anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody (N‐IL‐8) ( n = 3). (F–H) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining ( n = 5) and MPO‐DNA ELISA ( n = 3) for NETs formation after neutrophils were co‐cultured with the CM from SW620 cells treated with recombinant IL‐8 protein and with the CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated with an anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody. Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and two‐way ANOVA in (B, D, E, G, and H).

    Article Snippet: In the rescue assay, neutralizing antibodies against IL‐8 (10 mg/mL, MAB208, R&D, USA; RRID: AB_2249110) or IL‐8 protein (10 ng/mL, HY‐P7224, MCE, USA) were added to the CRC CM in the lower chamber for the rescue assay.

    Techniques: Plasmid Preparation, Control, Over Expression, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Derivative Assay, Expressing, RNA Sequencing, Analysis, Quantitative RT-PCR, Recombinant, Staining, Cell Culture

    MIIP in CRC cells decreases neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through NF‐κB p65/IL‐8 signaling. (A) Bubble plot of the enriched KEGG pathways showing that the NF‐κB signaling pathway was enriched in HCT116 cells (marked with a red border). (B) GSEA revealed that MIIP knockdown in HCT116 cells significantly activated the NF‐κB signaling pathway. (C) Western blotting analysis of key proteins involved in the NF‐κB p65 signaling pathway in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression. (D) Representative images of H&E and IHC staining for MIIP, p‐p65, IL‐8, and Ly6G in tumors from the cecum of an orthotopic CRC mouse model between the MIIP‐overexpressing group and the control group (n = 5 per group). Scale bar, 50 µm. (E) Statistical analysis of Ly6G + neutrophils and the expression of p‐p65 and IL‐8 in different groups. (F) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining for MPO (red), Cit‐H3 (green), and DAPI (blue) in tumor tissue from the cecum and comparisons between the two groups ( n = 5). Scale bar, 25 µm. (G) Western blotting of NF‐κB p65 and NF‐κB p‐p65 in CRC cells treated with or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor (Bay 11–7082, 10 µM). (H) RT‐qPCR of CXCL8 mRNA in CRC cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3). (I) ELISA of IL‐8 in CM from CRC cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3). (J) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CM from CRC cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3). (K–M) ELISA of MPO‐DNA and representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining for NETs formation after neutrophils were cultured with CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3–5). Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and the Mann‐Whitney U test in (E); the Mann‐Whitney U test in (F); and two‐way ANOVA in (H, I, J, K, and M).

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: MIIP Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Progression by Modulating Neutrophils Infiltration and Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation

    doi: 10.1002/advs.78063

    Figure Lengend Snippet: MIIP in CRC cells decreases neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through NF‐κB p65/IL‐8 signaling. (A) Bubble plot of the enriched KEGG pathways showing that the NF‐κB signaling pathway was enriched in HCT116 cells (marked with a red border). (B) GSEA revealed that MIIP knockdown in HCT116 cells significantly activated the NF‐κB signaling pathway. (C) Western blotting analysis of key proteins involved in the NF‐κB p65 signaling pathway in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression. (D) Representative images of H&E and IHC staining for MIIP, p‐p65, IL‐8, and Ly6G in tumors from the cecum of an orthotopic CRC mouse model between the MIIP‐overexpressing group and the control group (n = 5 per group). Scale bar, 50 µm. (E) Statistical analysis of Ly6G + neutrophils and the expression of p‐p65 and IL‐8 in different groups. (F) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining for MPO (red), Cit‐H3 (green), and DAPI (blue) in tumor tissue from the cecum and comparisons between the two groups ( n = 5). Scale bar, 25 µm. (G) Western blotting of NF‐κB p65 and NF‐κB p‐p65 in CRC cells treated with or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor (Bay 11–7082, 10 µM). (H) RT‐qPCR of CXCL8 mRNA in CRC cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3). (I) ELISA of IL‐8 in CM from CRC cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3). (J) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CM from CRC cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3). (K–M) ELISA of MPO‐DNA and representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining for NETs formation after neutrophils were cultured with CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3–5). Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and the Mann‐Whitney U test in (E); the Mann‐Whitney U test in (F); and two‐way ANOVA in (H, I, J, K, and M).

    Article Snippet: In the rescue assay, neutralizing antibodies against IL‐8 (10 mg/mL, MAB208, R&D, USA; RRID: AB_2249110) or IL‐8 protein (10 ng/mL, HY‐P7224, MCE, USA) were added to the CRC CM in the lower chamber for the rescue assay.

    Techniques: Knockdown, Western Blot, Analysis, Expressing, Immunohistochemistry, Control, Staining, Tissue, Quantitative RT-PCR, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Cell Culture, MANN-WHITNEY

    MIIP modulates the NF‐κB p65/IL‐8 signaling pathway ‐mediated neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through interactions with PKR. (A) IP–MS revealed PKR as a MIIP‐interacting protein. (B) The binding structure of MIIP and PKR was predicted using HDOCK molecular docking software. (C) Endogenous interaction between MIIP and PKR were detected via Co‐IP in HCT116 cells. (D) 293T cells were cotransfected with MIIP‐Flag and PKR‐HA, and reverse and forward Co‐IP analyses were performed. (E) Co‐IP assays were used to determine the PKR‐binding region of MIIP. (F) Co‐IP assays revealed that the PKR binding site for MIIP encompasses its IKKβ‐binding domain. (G) The expression of PKR was determined by Western blotting in CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression. (H) Co‐IP was performed to examine the effect of MIIP expression on the interaction between PKR and IKKβ. (I–M) Double‐stable transgenic CRC cell lines were used in a rescue assay to demonstrate that the regulatory effects of MIIP on the NF‐κB p65‐mediated IL‐8 signaling pathway (I–K) and NETs formation (L, M) were dependent on PKR ( n = 3–5). All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using two‐way ANOVA in (J–M).

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: MIIP Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Progression by Modulating Neutrophils Infiltration and Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation

    doi: 10.1002/advs.78063

    Figure Lengend Snippet: MIIP modulates the NF‐κB p65/IL‐8 signaling pathway ‐mediated neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through interactions with PKR. (A) IP–MS revealed PKR as a MIIP‐interacting protein. (B) The binding structure of MIIP and PKR was predicted using HDOCK molecular docking software. (C) Endogenous interaction between MIIP and PKR were detected via Co‐IP in HCT116 cells. (D) 293T cells were cotransfected with MIIP‐Flag and PKR‐HA, and reverse and forward Co‐IP analyses were performed. (E) Co‐IP assays were used to determine the PKR‐binding region of MIIP. (F) Co‐IP assays revealed that the PKR binding site for MIIP encompasses its IKKβ‐binding domain. (G) The expression of PKR was determined by Western blotting in CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression. (H) Co‐IP was performed to examine the effect of MIIP expression on the interaction between PKR and IKKβ. (I–M) Double‐stable transgenic CRC cell lines were used in a rescue assay to demonstrate that the regulatory effects of MIIP on the NF‐κB p65‐mediated IL‐8 signaling pathway (I–K) and NETs formation (L, M) were dependent on PKR ( n = 3–5). All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using two‐way ANOVA in (J–M).

    Article Snippet: In the rescue assay, neutralizing antibodies against IL‐8 (10 mg/mL, MAB208, R&D, USA; RRID: AB_2249110) or IL‐8 protein (10 ng/mL, HY‐P7224, MCE, USA) were added to the CRC CM in the lower chamber for the rescue assay.

    Techniques: Protein-Protein interactions, Binding Assay, Docking Assay, Software, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Expressing, Western Blot, Transgenic Assay, Rescue Assay

    Schematic illustration shows that MIIP inhibits colorectal cancer progression by decreasing TANs infiltration and NETs formation through the PKR/NF‐κB p65/IL‐8 axis, providing potential therapeutic strategies for colorectal cancer.

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: MIIP Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Progression by Modulating Neutrophils Infiltration and Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation

    doi: 10.1002/advs.78063

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic illustration shows that MIIP inhibits colorectal cancer progression by decreasing TANs infiltration and NETs formation through the PKR/NF‐κB p65/IL‐8 axis, providing potential therapeutic strategies for colorectal cancer.

    Article Snippet: In the rescue assay, neutralizing antibodies against IL‐8 (10 mg/mL, MAB208, R&D, USA; RRID: AB_2249110) or IL‐8 protein (10 ng/mL, HY‐P7224, MCE, USA) were added to the CRC CM in the lower chamber for the rescue assay.

    Techniques:

    MIIP in CRC cells inhibits neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through IL‐8. (A) Human cytokine array of the CM collected from SW620 cells with vector control and MIIP overexpression. (B) ELISA quantification of secreted IL‐8 protein levels in CM derived from three CRC cell lines with differential MIIP expression ( n = 3). (C) Volcano plot of DEGs from RNA‐seq analysis of CRC cell lines with varying levels of MIIP expression ( n = 3 per group). (D) CXCL8 mRNA expression in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression was tested by RT–qPCR ( n = 3). (E) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to CRC CM with or without recombinant human IL‐8 protein (rhIL‐8). Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CRC CM with or without anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody (N‐IL‐8) ( n = 3). (F–H) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining ( n = 5) and MPO‐DNA ELISA ( n = 3) for NETs formation after neutrophils were co‐cultured with the CM from SW620 cells treated with recombinant IL‐8 protein and with the CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated with an anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody. Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and two‐way ANOVA in (B, D, E, G, and H).

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: MIIP Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Progression by Modulating Neutrophils Infiltration and Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation

    doi: 10.1002/advs.78063

    Figure Lengend Snippet: MIIP in CRC cells inhibits neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through IL‐8. (A) Human cytokine array of the CM collected from SW620 cells with vector control and MIIP overexpression. (B) ELISA quantification of secreted IL‐8 protein levels in CM derived from three CRC cell lines with differential MIIP expression ( n = 3). (C) Volcano plot of DEGs from RNA‐seq analysis of CRC cell lines with varying levels of MIIP expression ( n = 3 per group). (D) CXCL8 mRNA expression in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression was tested by RT–qPCR ( n = 3). (E) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to CRC CM with or without recombinant human IL‐8 protein (rhIL‐8). Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CRC CM with or without anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody (N‐IL‐8) ( n = 3). (F–H) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining ( n = 5) and MPO‐DNA ELISA ( n = 3) for NETs formation after neutrophils were co‐cultured with the CM from SW620 cells treated with recombinant IL‐8 protein and with the CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated with an anti‐IL‐8 neutralizing antibody. Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and two‐way ANOVA in (B, D, E, G, and H).

    Article Snippet: In the rescue assay, neutralizing antibodies against IL‐8 (10 mg/mL, MAB208, R&D, USA; RRID: AB_2249110) or IL‐8 protein (10 ng/mL, HY‐P7224, MCE, USA) were added to the CRC CM in the lower chamber for the rescue assay.

    Techniques: Plasmid Preparation, Control, Over Expression, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Derivative Assay, Expressing, RNA Sequencing, Analysis, Quantitative RT-PCR, Recombinant, Staining, Cell Culture

    MIIP in CRC cells decreases neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through NF‐κB p65/IL‐8 signaling. (A) Bubble plot of the enriched KEGG pathways showing that the NF‐κB signaling pathway was enriched in HCT116 cells (marked with a red border). (B) GSEA revealed that MIIP knockdown in HCT116 cells significantly activated the NF‐κB signaling pathway. (C) Western blotting analysis of key proteins involved in the NF‐κB p65 signaling pathway in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression. (D) Representative images of H&E and IHC staining for MIIP, p‐p65, IL‐8, and Ly6G in tumors from the cecum of an orthotopic CRC mouse model between the MIIP‐overexpressing group and the control group (n = 5 per group). Scale bar, 50 µm. (E) Statistical analysis of Ly6G + neutrophils and the expression of p‐p65 and IL‐8 in different groups. (F) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining for MPO (red), Cit‐H3 (green), and DAPI (blue) in tumor tissue from the cecum and comparisons between the two groups ( n = 5). Scale bar, 25 µm. (G) Western blotting of NF‐κB p65 and NF‐κB p‐p65 in CRC cells treated with or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor (Bay 11–7082, 10 µM). (H) RT‐qPCR of CXCL8 mRNA in CRC cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3). (I) ELISA of IL‐8 in CM from CRC cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3). (J) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CM from CRC cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3). (K–M) ELISA of MPO‐DNA and representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining for NETs formation after neutrophils were cultured with CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3–5). Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and the Mann‐Whitney U test in (E); the Mann‐Whitney U test in (F); and two‐way ANOVA in (H, I, J, K, and M).

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: MIIP Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Progression by Modulating Neutrophils Infiltration and Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation

    doi: 10.1002/advs.78063

    Figure Lengend Snippet: MIIP in CRC cells decreases neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through NF‐κB p65/IL‐8 signaling. (A) Bubble plot of the enriched KEGG pathways showing that the NF‐κB signaling pathway was enriched in HCT116 cells (marked with a red border). (B) GSEA revealed that MIIP knockdown in HCT116 cells significantly activated the NF‐κB signaling pathway. (C) Western blotting analysis of key proteins involved in the NF‐κB p65 signaling pathway in human CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression. (D) Representative images of H&E and IHC staining for MIIP, p‐p65, IL‐8, and Ly6G in tumors from the cecum of an orthotopic CRC mouse model between the MIIP‐overexpressing group and the control group (n = 5 per group). Scale bar, 50 µm. (E) Statistical analysis of Ly6G + neutrophils and the expression of p‐p65 and IL‐8 in different groups. (F) Representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining for MPO (red), Cit‐H3 (green), and DAPI (blue) in tumor tissue from the cecum and comparisons between the two groups ( n = 5). Scale bar, 25 µm. (G) Western blotting of NF‐κB p65 and NF‐κB p‐p65 in CRC cells treated with or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor (Bay 11–7082, 10 µM). (H) RT‐qPCR of CXCL8 mRNA in CRC cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3). (I) ELISA of IL‐8 in CM from CRC cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3). (J) Quantification of neutrophils that migrated to the CM from CRC cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3). (K–M) ELISA of MPO‐DNA and representative images and statistical quantification of IF staining for NETs formation after neutrophils were cultured with CM from SW480 and HCT116 cells treated or not treated with an NF‐κB inhibitor ( n = 3–5). Scale bar, 50 µm. All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t‐test and the Mann‐Whitney U test in (E); the Mann‐Whitney U test in (F); and two‐way ANOVA in (H, I, J, K, and M).

    Article Snippet: In the rescue assay, neutralizing antibodies against IL‐8 (10 mg/mL, MAB208, R&D, USA; RRID: AB_2249110) or IL‐8 protein (10 ng/mL, HY‐P7224, MCE, USA) were added to the CRC CM in the lower chamber for the rescue assay.

    Techniques: Knockdown, Western Blot, Analysis, Expressing, Immunohistochemistry, Control, Staining, Tissue, Quantitative RT-PCR, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Cell Culture, MANN-WHITNEY

    MIIP modulates the NF‐κB p65/IL‐8 signaling pathway ‐mediated neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through interactions with PKR. (A) IP–MS revealed PKR as a MIIP‐interacting protein. (B) The binding structure of MIIP and PKR was predicted using HDOCK molecular docking software. (C) Endogenous interaction between MIIP and PKR were detected via Co‐IP in HCT116 cells. (D) 293T cells were cotransfected with MIIP‐Flag and PKR‐HA, and reverse and forward Co‐IP analyses were performed. (E) Co‐IP assays were used to determine the PKR‐binding region of MIIP. (F) Co‐IP assays revealed that the PKR binding site for MIIP encompasses its IKKβ‐binding domain. (G) The expression of PKR was determined by Western blotting in CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression. (H) Co‐IP was performed to examine the effect of MIIP expression on the interaction between PKR and IKKβ. (I–M) Double‐stable transgenic CRC cell lines were used in a rescue assay to demonstrate that the regulatory effects of MIIP on the NF‐κB p65‐mediated IL‐8 signaling pathway (I–K) and NETs formation (L, M) were dependent on PKR ( n = 3–5). All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using two‐way ANOVA in (J–M).

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: MIIP Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Progression by Modulating Neutrophils Infiltration and Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation

    doi: 10.1002/advs.78063

    Figure Lengend Snippet: MIIP modulates the NF‐κB p65/IL‐8 signaling pathway ‐mediated neutrophil infiltration and NETs formation through interactions with PKR. (A) IP–MS revealed PKR as a MIIP‐interacting protein. (B) The binding structure of MIIP and PKR was predicted using HDOCK molecular docking software. (C) Endogenous interaction between MIIP and PKR were detected via Co‐IP in HCT116 cells. (D) 293T cells were cotransfected with MIIP‐Flag and PKR‐HA, and reverse and forward Co‐IP analyses were performed. (E) Co‐IP assays were used to determine the PKR‐binding region of MIIP. (F) Co‐IP assays revealed that the PKR binding site for MIIP encompasses its IKKβ‐binding domain. (G) The expression of PKR was determined by Western blotting in CRC cells with different levels of MIIP expression. (H) Co‐IP was performed to examine the effect of MIIP expression on the interaction between PKR and IKKβ. (I–M) Double‐stable transgenic CRC cell lines were used in a rescue assay to demonstrate that the regulatory effects of MIIP on the NF‐κB p65‐mediated IL‐8 signaling pathway (I–K) and NETs formation (L, M) were dependent on PKR ( n = 3–5). All the data are shown as the mean ± SD; * , p < 0.05; ** , p < 0.01; *** , p < 0.001. NS, not significant. Statistical significance was assessed using two‐way ANOVA in (J–M).

    Article Snippet: In the rescue assay, neutralizing antibodies against IL‐8 (10 mg/mL, MAB208, R&D, USA; RRID: AB_2249110) or IL‐8 protein (10 ng/mL, HY‐P7224, MCE, USA) were added to the CRC CM in the lower chamber for the rescue assay.

    Techniques: Protein-Protein interactions, Binding Assay, Docking Assay, Software, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Expressing, Western Blot, Transgenic Assay, Rescue Assay

    Schematic illustration shows that MIIP inhibits colorectal cancer progression by decreasing TANs infiltration and NETs formation through the PKR/NF‐κB p65/IL‐8 axis, providing potential therapeutic strategies for colorectal cancer.

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: MIIP Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Progression by Modulating Neutrophils Infiltration and Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation

    doi: 10.1002/advs.78063

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic illustration shows that MIIP inhibits colorectal cancer progression by decreasing TANs infiltration and NETs formation through the PKR/NF‐κB p65/IL‐8 axis, providing potential therapeutic strategies for colorectal cancer.

    Article Snippet: In the rescue assay, neutralizing antibodies against IL‐8 (10 mg/mL, MAB208, R&D, USA; RRID: AB_2249110) or IL‐8 protein (10 ng/mL, HY‐P7224, MCE, USA) were added to the CRC CM in the lower chamber for the rescue assay.

    Techniques: